Unexploded ordnance
Glossary of common terms used in the management of land contamination, published on the Planning Portal, defines an unexploded ordnance (UXO) as an: ‘…explosive ordnance that has been either primed, fused, armed or prepared for use and has been subsequently fired, dropped, launched, projected or placed in such a manner as to present a hazard to operations, persons or objects and remains unexploded either by malfunction or design.’
Unexploded ordnances are a significant concern for construction projects in the UK, especially in areas with historical ties to military activities, such as those bombed during World War II. Many areas in the UK, especially cities like London, Manchester, and Coventry, were heavily bombed during WWII and unexploded bombs and munitions are frequently found in these regions. Historical military training sites and ordnance manufacturing facilities are also potential hotspots for UXOs.
Addressing UXOs is critical for safety, regulatory compliance, project efficiency, and cost management. UXOs pose a direct threat to life and property. If disturbed during excavation or piling, these devices can detonate, causing injury, fatalities, or substantial property damage. Construction workers and the surrounding public are at risk, making UXO identification and mitigation a significant safety priority.
UXO risk assessments are often part of pre-construction surveys in high-risk areas. Conducting these surveys helps to avoid surprises and integrate risk mitigation measures into project planning. The possible presence of UXOs may influence decisions on excavation methods, site layout, and even project timelines.
Discovering a UXO mid-project can halt construction, causing significant delays. Specialist UXO surveys and removal services are required, which can add unplanned costs. However, If not addressed proactively, the costs of dealing with a UXO incident far exceed those of preventative measures. Health and safety regulations in the UK, such as the Health and Safety at Work Act 1974, require employers to identify and mitigate risks, including UXOs. Ignoring UXO risks can lead to legal penalties and liabilities if an incident occurs.
An unintended detonation can have wider consequences, including damage to nearby properties and disruption to local communities. Environmental considerations also come into play, as the chemicals from UXOs could contaminate soil and water.
[edit] To manage UXO risks, it may be necessary to undertake:
- Historical risk assessments, reviewing bombing records, military maps, and historical data to assess the likelihood of UXOs on a site.
- Geophysical surveys using magnetometers and other technologies to detect metal anomalies underground.
- Engaging UXO experts to identify, assess, and safely remove or neutralise ordnances.
[edit] Related articles on Designing Buildings
Featured articles and news
Building Control Independent Panel final report
A precis of a key report lead by Dame Hackitt with full recomendations and link to the government response.
Guide to ISO 19650 for Architecture Firms (2026)
A user gives their low down.
A UK training and membership provider for mould remediation professionals.
Building Safety recap April, 2026
A short and longer run-through of the month, with links to further information and sources.
CIAT May 2026 briefing.
Independent NSI and BAFE study exploring how organisations are changing the way they buy fire safety services.
From medieval scribes to modern word art.
ECA welcomes crackdown on late payment and push for clean energy, whilst CIOB seek fixed cladding removal timeframes.
Cyber Security in the Built Environment
Protecting projects, data, and digital assets: A CIOB Academy TIS.
Managing competence in the built environment
ITFG publishes new industry guide on how to meet the ICC principles.
The UK's campaign to reduce noise pollution: Mythbusting, articles and topic guides.
Setting Expectations on Competence Management
Industry Competence Committee.
New Scottish and Welsh governments
CIOB stresses importance of construction after new parliament elections.
The sad story of Derby Hippodrome
An historic building left to decay.
ECA, JIB and JTL back Fabian Society call to invest in skills for a stronger built environment workforce.




















