Unexploded ordnance
Glossary of common terms used in the management of land contamination, published on the Planning Portal, defines an unexploded ordnance (UXO) as an: ‘…explosive ordnance that has been either primed, fused, armed or prepared for use and has been subsequently fired, dropped, launched, projected or placed in such a manner as to present a hazard to operations, persons or objects and remains unexploded either by malfunction or design.’
Unexploded ordnances are a significant concern for construction projects in the UK, especially in areas with historical ties to military activities, such as those bombed during World War II. Many areas in the UK, especially cities like London, Manchester, and Coventry, were heavily bombed during WWII and unexploded bombs and munitions are frequently found in these regions. Historical military training sites and ordnance manufacturing facilities are also potential hotspots for UXOs.
Addressing UXOs is critical for safety, regulatory compliance, project efficiency, and cost management. UXOs pose a direct threat to life and property. If disturbed during excavation or piling, these devices can detonate, causing injury, fatalities, or substantial property damage. Construction workers and the surrounding public are at risk, making UXO identification and mitigation a significant safety priority.
UXO risk assessments are often part of pre-construction surveys in high-risk areas. Conducting these surveys helps to avoid surprises and integrate risk mitigation measures into project planning. The possible presence of UXOs may influence decisions on excavation methods, site layout, and even project timelines.
Discovering a UXO mid-project can halt construction, causing significant delays. Specialist UXO surveys and removal services are required, which can add unplanned costs. However, If not addressed proactively, the costs of dealing with a UXO incident far exceed those of preventative measures. Health and safety regulations in the UK, such as the Health and Safety at Work Act 1974, require employers to identify and mitigate risks, including UXOs. Ignoring UXO risks can lead to legal penalties and liabilities if an incident occurs.
An unintended detonation can have wider consequences, including damage to nearby properties and disruption to local communities. Environmental considerations also come into play, as the chemicals from UXOs could contaminate soil and water.
[edit] To manage UXO risks, it may be necessary to undertake:
- Historical risk assessments, reviewing bombing records, military maps, and historical data to assess the likelihood of UXOs on a site.
- Geophysical surveys using magnetometers and other technologies to detect metal anomalies underground.
- Engaging UXO experts to identify, assess, and safely remove or neutralise ordnances.
[edit] Related articles on Designing Buildings
Featured articles
Check out some of the best features and news from Designing Buildings as well as key stories from around the web.
Gasholders: a history in pictures. Book review.
Recognition, influence and growth
SocEnv identifies three strategic pillars in new strategy to 2045.
Discover the future of roofing, cladding and insulation.
New guidance for professional practice, cultural change and regulation in social housing.
The heritage of nuclear and conventional power stations.
New measures to stop people being ripped off
Government to protect families from cowboy builders and aggressive bailiffs.
New Futurebuild showcase brings an innovation-first approach.
National Planning Policy Framework
Understanding the 2026 changes.
ECA's public affairs priorities
Member consultation opens to shape priorities for 2027 to 2030.
Dutyholder responsibilities from 1 July 2026.
Where performance meets practice
The Building Envelope Stage at UKCW Birmingham.
CIAT publishes briefing on planning reforms.

















